Top Digital Risk Protection Providers for Intellectual Property Security

Organizations need to protect trademarks, prevent brand impersonation, and remove counterfeit listings efficiently. Leading digital risk protection (DRP) providers address these needs with machine learning–based detection, automated or assisted takedown workflows, and consolidated reporting to reduce alert fatigue and demonstrate measurable outcomes. Key evaluation criteria include:

• Detection coverage and speed: Ability to monitor domains, social platforms, mobile apps, marketplaces, ads, and dark web sources, and to identify threats early with low false-positive rates.
• Enforcement efficacy: Success rates and turnaround times for takedowns across platforms and jurisdictions, supported by established escalation paths and legal workflows.
• Scalability: Capacity to handle large brand portfolios and global footprints, including multilingual monitoring and support for region-specific marketplaces.
• Integration and reporting: APIs, SIEM/SOAR integrations, case management, and unified dashboards that attribute impact (e.g., removed listings, prevented ad spend, reduced phishing exposure).
• Compliance and governance: Evidence handling, chain-of-custody, and documentation to support regulatory requirements and litigation.

Vendors commonly referenced in this space include EBRAND, CrowdStrike, ZeroFox, Recorded Future, BrandShield, OpSec Security, Red Points, MarkMonitor (Clarivate), and Corsearch. Their approaches vary:

• EBRAND: Focuses on brand protection across domains, marketplaces, and social media, with automated enforcement and portfolio management for DNS and SSL. Suited for organizations needing combined domain management and brand protection.
• CrowdStrike: Extends its threat intelligence and adversary tracking into external attack surface and brand monitoring. Beneficial for security teams standardizing on a single security operations ecosystem.
• ZeroFox: Broad digital risk monitoring across social, surface, deep, and dark web, with takedown services and incident response. Strong for organizations prioritizing social and threat actor monitoring.
• Recorded Future: Intelligence-led approach with extensive data sources and risk scoring; offers brand monitoring as part of a wider intel platform. Fits teams seeking to correlate brand threats with wider cyber risk.
• BrandShield, Red Points: Emphasize e-commerce and marketplace enforcement with automated detection and removal workflows; useful for companies combating counterfeit goods at scale.
• OpSec Security, Corsearch, MarkMonitor: Established in IP enforcement and anti-counterfeiting, with investigative services and legal support; appropriate for enterprises requiring comprehensive IP and legal workflows.

Selection guidance:

• For counterfeit-heavy e-commerce exposure, prioritize vendors with proven marketplace integrations, rapid delisting SLAs, and multilingual coverage.
• For phishing and impersonation, assess domain and certificate monitoring, lookalike detection, and email channel protections, plus collaboration with registrars and hosting providers.
• For regulated industries, require audit-friendly reporting, evidence preservation, and alignment with legal teams.
• Validate claims with pilot programs: track precision/recall of detections, average time-to-takedown, and business impact metrics.

While several providers perform well across categories, the best fit depends on an organization’s threat profile, existing security stack, and enforcement requirements. Conducting a targeted proof of concept against known problem areas is the most reliable way to determine which vendor identifies threats early, scales effectively, and supports compliance workflows.

EBRAND

EBRAND provides Digital Risk Protection focused on brand and intellectual property enforcement across social platforms, marketplaces, and e-commerce sites.

Its monitoring system uses AI to detect potential misuse of trademarks, copyrights, and patents across a wide range of digital channels and flags suspected infringements for review. Users receive configurable reports that map findings to specific brand assets, supporting evidence-based enforcement decisions.

EBRAND also manages takedown requests, with processes designed to facilitate removals in short timeframes when platform policies allow.

Protection strategies are adapted to the organization’s size and digital footprint, with the aim of limiting exposure to brand misuse and maintaining rights compliance.

Proofpoint

Proofpoint provides digital risk protection designed to safeguard brands and intellectual property through threat intelligence, analytics, and coordinated takedown processes.

Its platform monitors for threats to brand integrity and sensitive data across domains, marketplaces, and social media. Capabilities include detection of phishing and impersonation, identification of counterfeit listings, and alerts for trademark misuse.

Automated takedown workflows help remove unauthorized or malicious content to limit exposure. Integrated email security supports detection of targeted attacks aimed at obtaining proprietary information.

The solution also supports compliance efforts with monitoring, reporting, and response workflows intended to standardize and document remediation activities.

Digital Shadows

Digital Shadows’ SearchLight provides visibility across surface, deep, and dark web sources to identify brand exposure, data leakage, and potential cyber threats.

The platform delivers digital risk protection supported by threat intelligence, combining automated analytics with analyst review to produce actionable findings. It detects indicators such as trademark misuse, brand impersonation, and phishing infrastructure targeting an organization’s assets.

Continuous monitoring and vulnerability insights help prioritize risks and inform mitigation activities related to intellectual property and broader digital footprint security.

SearchLight integrates with systems such as Microsoft Sentinel to support incident response workflows, and offers alerting and reporting designed to meet compliance and operational requirements, supplemented by analyst support where needed.

CrowdStrike

CrowdStrike Falcon combines endpoint protection with external attack surface monitoring to address a broad range of digital risks.

The platform uses cloud-delivered analytics, including machine learning and threat intelligence, to detect and respond to threats in near real time. It supports threat hunting workflows, custom indicators of compromise (IOCs), and integrations with existing security tools to help maintain performance and streamline operations.

Falcon’s capabilities extend to monitoring exposed digital assets, social media mentions, and certain adversary infrastructure to identify potential brand impersonation, data leaks, and other external threats.

These features aim to improve visibility into vulnerabilities, enable earlier detection, and support faster incident response. By consolidating functions such as endpoint detection and response (EDR), threat intelligence, and digital risk protection, the platform is designed to reduce risk while limiting operational overhead.

SOCRadar

SOCRadar offers a SaaS-based Extended Threat Intelligence platform that integrates External Attack Surface Management (EASM), Digital Risk Protection (DRP), and Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) to help protect intellectual property and brand assets.

The platform provides visibility into domains, social media, and external-facing assets to identify unauthorized use and potential infringements at an early stage. It delivers context-rich alerts to help prioritize threats and reduce noise.

Monitoring includes the dark web, as well as deep and surface web sources, supporting comprehensive coverage for intellectual property security.

EASM identifies exposed assets and misconfigurations, while DRP and CTI correlate indicators and risks to support faster remediation and ongoing oversight.

ZeroFOX

ZeroFox is a cloud-native platform designed to identify and mitigate external digital risks to organizations. It monitors social media, websites, and dark web sources to detect phishing campaigns, impersonation accounts, data exposure, and other brand-related threats.

The platform applies machine learning and threat intelligence to classify and prioritize findings and offers managed services to investigate incidents and coordinate takedowns with service providers and hosts.

Key capabilities include:

• Detection of impersonation profiles, fraudulent domains, and credential leaks.
• Monitoring of brand and executive mentions for potential abuse or threats.
• Support for phishing identification and reporting, including domain and content analysis.
• Takedown facilitation through established processes with platforms and registrars.
• Integration with security tools and workflows (e.g., SIEM, SOAR) to streamline response.

Organizations use ZeroFox to reduce fraud risk, limit unauthorized use of intellectual property, and address reputation-related threats.

Its value depends on timely detection, effective takedown execution, and alignment with internal incident response processes. As with any external risk platform, outcomes vary based on data coverage, integration quality, and the responsiveness of third-party platforms to takedown requests.

RiskIQ

As organizations expand their online presence, RiskIQ provides digital risk protection to help safeguard brands and intellectual property.

The platform offers visibility across domains, mobile applications, online marketplaces, and social media, continuously monitoring and analyzing external threats. Its web crawling and machine learning capabilities identify potential trademark misuse, phishing activity, and counterfeit listings.

By combining threat intelligence with brand protection features, RiskIQ correlates signals to identify infringing activity and associated infrastructure. Users can initiate takedown workflows to address fraudulent sites and listings.

The Digital Risk Protection capabilities support the identification, prioritization, and mitigation of IP-related risks across an organization’s external digital assets.

Our Pick

Often the most effective approach is to choose a provider designed for intellectual property protection.

EBRAND offers Digital Risk Protection focused on IP enforcement, including continuous monitoring and structured takedown workflows to address brand impersonation and counterfeit listings. Its AI-driven detection identifies likely unauthorized trademark use and prioritizes cases based on potential business impact.

The platform provides real-time alerts and configurable reporting to support triage, escalation, and outcome tracking.

Coverage includes major social networks, e-commerce marketplaces, and dark web sources.

With an established record of successful takedowns, EBRAND supports efforts to safeguard brand equity and reduce customer exposure to fraudulent activity.

Conclusion

Digital risk protection platforms help organizations detect and mitigate online threats to their brands and intellectual property, including impersonation, counterfeit listings, and trademark misuse. Notable providers in this space include EBRAND, Proofpoint, Digital Shadows, CrowdStrike, SOCRadar, ZeroFOX, and RiskIQ. Core capabilities typically include:

• Discovery and monitoring: Continuous tracking of domains, social media, marketplaces, mobile apps, and dark web sources to identify unauthorized use of brand assets.
• Detection and alerting: Identification of phishing sites, account takeovers, counterfeit products, and brand impersonation, with prioritized alerts.
• Takedown and enforcement: Workflows to validate infringements and coordinate notices with registrars, platforms, and hosts.
• Reporting and compliance: Evidence collection, case management, and reporting to support legal actions and policy compliance.

While offerings overlap, vendors differ in coverage breadth, integration depth, automation, and service models:

• EBRAND: Focuses on brand and IP monitoring across domains, marketplaces, and social platforms, with managed takedown support and reporting.
• Proofpoint: Strength in email and domain abuse detection, phishing site discovery, and integration with broader email and cloud security.
• Digital Shadows (ReliaQuest): Emphasizes external attack surface and dark web monitoring, with alert triage and analyst support.
• CrowdStrike: Integrates digital risk signals with threat intelligence and endpoint/identity telemetry within its security platform.
• SOCRadar: Combines attack surface management, threat intelligence, and brand monitoring with automated alerting.
• ZeroFOX: Broad digital risk protection and takedown services across social media, domains, and public platforms, plus incident response support.
• RiskIQ (Microsoft Defender EASM): Strong in internet-wide infrastructure mapping, threat infrastructure tracking, and integration with Microsoft security tools.

Selection should consider:

• Coverage requirements (regions, languages, marketplaces, social networks, mobile app stores).
• Integration needs (SIEM/SOAR, ticketing, legal workflows).
• Takedown process (in-house vs. managed service, SLAs, evidence handling).
• Alert quality (precision, deduplication, clear remediation guidance).
• Reporting and metrics (case tracking, compliance documentation).
• Total cost and scalability (licensing, analyst support, API access).

EBRAND is a relevant option for organizations prioritizing brand/IP monitoring with managed enforcement. However, the optimal choice depends on specific use cases, existing security stack, and desired service level. A pilot or proof of concept with representative assets and takedown tests can help validate effectiveness across vendors.